🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors have labeled it as one of the largest scams of its nature in the Britain.

Altogether 14 individuals have been sentenced for their role in a £28 million conspiracy to defraud over 3,500 timeshare holders.

The targets were desperate to exit decades-old timeshare contracts and tried to find help.

Most were in the age range of 60 and 80. Over 500 of them parted with more than £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.

Those victimized were exposed to intense sales meetings extending for six hours. They were out of money, possessing useless fake "points" and remained bound by high-priced vacation property deals they could no longer use.

The Business Central to the Scam

The company at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took clients' cash to finance the proprietors' luxurious standard of living of prestigious schooling, high-end properties and personal aircraft.

The man at the top of the company, Mark Rowe, was given a seven and a half year sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his partner Nicola was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She was given a 24-month deferred imprisonment at the judicial venue after pleading guilty to financial crime.

This has been a extended wait and represents a significant success for the victims who came forward, the police and prosecutors.

The Way the Investigation Was Initiated

I first heard about the firm came in the summer of 2016. The role involved in the investigations unit of a media outlet, producing investigative programmes.

A friend noted that his parent had assumed the ownership of a holiday property in the Spanish coast and, after decades of vacations, had started seeking to get out of the agreement.

It's worth mentioning how common vacation properties had grown with UK travelers in the last decades of the 20th century.

Holiday ownership enabled families to access the equivalent unit every year, or trade their time slots with additional holders who had properties in other resorts. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that chance.

The first timeshare rush was paired with a numerous stories about unscrupulous sellers fraudulently marketing properties. They were regularly featured on investigative broadcasts.

The standard holiday ownership agreement bound owners for long periods.

By 2016, those owners who had experienced their guaranteed place in the sun for decades were getting older, and many were looking to end their association to their timeshares.

A number had reduced ability to travel and were unable to visit their units. Some just believed they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And a portion had died, in frequent situations bequeathing their heirs to take over the deals - including their yearly fees and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Develops

This was the situation the relative had ended up. She browsed the internet for options and came across the organization, a business whose digital platform claimed to get her out of her agreement.

Yet, having made a payment and booked a meeting with them, her family smelled a rat.

Additional investigation revealed numerous individuals reporting they had submitted funds and got nothing in return. In fact, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.

Our team started looking into what was going on. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals active in the timeshare resale sector.

A legal professional had numerous client reports aiming to litigate against the company.

Reporters contacted clients who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the business would buy their property away from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were told there was no re-sale value.

In place of that, they were persuaded - in fact pressured - to spend more money purchasing "the company's points system", linked to the outfit's parent company, the parent organization.

The precise definition was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a form of credit, giving access to reduced-price holidays and benefits and consumer discounts.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with fellow investors, at a future date.

Paying cash up front now would lead to an eventual payoff that would pay for the company's charges and result in the investor in profit, freed at last from their burdensome agreement.

An unrealistic promise? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Misleading Scam'

Based on these descriptions were accurate, this was a large-scale fraud.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

Someone - here the company - "attracts the consumer by promoting a specific service only to then state it cannot be provided, directing the individual to a different, lower-quality option.

Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the accounts we had collected, we argued to discreetly video one of the organization's sessions.

This takes commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the only way to obtain the evidence needed to demonstrate illegal activity.

With approval secured, our limited crew organized a appointment with one of the company's representatives in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Pretending to be a potential client aiming to get his mum free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement